"Not again"
01 / 23 / 04
irate
The following is directly quoted from Bill the Radish. Cross-posted to my livejournal, so if you get it twice, my apologies.
"I'm sure by now everyone's seen this, but I'm condensing a bit. First there was the AFA's rigged poll on whether or not gay marriage and/or civil unions were supported by their members the general populous. Then it was annulled because "homosexual activist groups" were leaked this information (because obviously, homosexual activists are not voting members of the country with a right to have their opinions counted in something directly concerning them) and caused the poll "to represent something other than what we wanted it to. And so far, they succeeded with that."
Please note the "what we wanted it to" in there. I can understand that they were expecting something else, but that does not make the results any more invalid than what they were originally planning on using to submit to congress.
But now? We have a new poll to "cause to represent something other than what [they] wanted it to."
Have at. Let's see a somewhat honest representation there, shall we? (in other words, if you wouldn't vote for a presidential candidate who supported gay/lesbian marriage or civil unions...vote for that option. I don't care. so long as both sides have a say.)"
Sorry, spammers forced my hand. Comments reviewed before being published.
still winds
